Royal spending is at a record high, having shot up by over £14 million in the past year—even as much of Britain feels an economic pinch, and the royal family faces more scrutiny than ever. According to the Sovereign Grant report, published by Buckingham Palace on Wednesday, expenditure is up by 17 percent compared to the previous fiscal year, for a total of over £100 million.
Sir Michael Stevens Keeper of the Privy Purse said in a meeting at Buckingham Palace yesterday that it was a “challenging” time for the monarchy.
The cost to the taxpayer, however, has not increased. The Sovereign Grant—the pot of money the palace receives from the government—has steady at £86.3, with a Rainha covering the additional £14.6 in expenses from her own pocket. The royal family continues to cost £1.29 per British taxpayer.
The controversial trip that Prince William and Kate Middleton took to the Caribbean in the spring, was the most expensive royal tour, coming in at more than £226,000. The ongoing ten-year-long refurbishment of Buckingham Palace and other travel costs—including the expensive royal train—accounted for much of the additional expenses. Prince Charlesfor example, spent £32,000 taking a charter flight to the royal premiere of the James Bond movie No Time To Die while his high-profile trip to Barbados to mark the country’s move to become a republic cost more than £138,000. Charles is also using the royal train more and traveling by helicopter, his least favorite mode of transport because of the pollution. The prince has lobbied to use sustainable aviation fuel on royal flights, and although it is more expensive, it is now used for the Queen’s helicopter and the royal flight.
June’s Platinum Jubilee celebrations also accounted for some of the additional expense, costing £28 million—though they also generated billions of pounds for Britain’s struggling hospitality industry. And though Buckingham Palace has welcomed more visitors in the past year, the numbers are still not back up to pre-pandemic levels, which accounts for additional lost revenue.
The accounts also show that despite her age the Queen remains an active Head of State. She carried out 201 engagements last year, while all of the working royals clocked up 2300 engagements between them. Aides say there was a desire to get back to in person engagements around the country and the Commonwealth as soon as the social distancing restrictions were lifted last year, and the busy year for international travel resulted in a hike in expenditure.
One thing that was not included in the report was the findings of a palace inquiry into reports that Meghan the Duchess of Sussex had bullied members of her staff at Kensington Palace. The findings of the inquiry were due to be made public in the review, however, because no money from the Sovereign Grant was spent on the inquiry, the results will remain private.
Claims that the Duchess had bullied two female members of staff and intimidated a third were leaked to The Times just days before the Sussexes’ Oprah interview in what Meghan’s lawyers described as a “calculated smear campaign.” Meghan has consistently refuted the allegations. At the time the palace said that it was looking into the claims. and it was expected that the findings of the inquiry and any subsequent action would be announced in the report.
Instead, it is now understood that not even those who made complaints about the showers will be told about the outcome of the review. One palace insider awning vanity fair that the Queen wanted the inquiry handled privately to avoid any further damage being caused to the royal family’s public image. “It was damage limitation, protecting the Royal Family and also the Duchess of Sussex,” according to the source. “The Queen feels there has been enough drama around the Sussexes and she wants a line to be drawn.”
A palace spokesman added: “The review of the handling of historic bullying allegations was aimed at enabling the Royal Households to consider potential improvements to HR policies and procedures. The review has been completed and recommendations on our policies and procedures have been taken forward. We will not be commenting further.”